Puppies;
We are looking for athletes. Look for a well co-ordinated puppy. Puppies often have trouble moving from one gait to another. At 8 weeks of age, the side movement you see will be the same as you will see as an adult.The coming and going at 8 weeks will change as an adult.Avoid making too many allowances for your puppies.Big, overdone puppies may not be the best choice. Make sure you don’t just keep a big puppy for size. Make sure he is a very good example of the breed also. Straighter puppies are more in control of themselves as puppies. Be careful you don’t fall into this trap either. You can miss a good puppy because he looks too small.A puppy with proper angulation may be cowhocked as a puppy.Patience and puppies go together.
Breeding;
The difference between a personal bitch and a foundation bitch; A personal bitch was the owner’s first breeding bitch.Breeding up does work but it takes a long time.You breed a mediocre bitch to a good sire and keep the best . Then you repeat the process. This method is costly and time consuming.
A true foundation bitch is classic and well formed and comes from great bloodlines.She should be a bitch that is producing or is capable of producing superbe progeny. She will also produce progeny that are capable of producing themselves. Selection is the key to the breeding program.As the quality of the judging goes down then the good breeders need to be even more vigilent. Only select the best from each breeding to go into the gene pool for the next generation. You need to breed for the same type each time you breed. Set your type and continue to work in that direction.The more traits you select for then the less improvement you will see over the generations.The less traits you select for then the quicker will be your progress through your breeding program. One rule of thumb is to never go to a sire whose dam you do not like.The most important dog in your breeding program is the sire’s dam.
In-breeding- father-daughter,mother-son,brother-sister This is a very severe test and you must be prepared to cull as lethal genes will be brought to the fore if any are present.
Line breeding- half brother-half sister, aunt-nephew,grandmother-grandson The common thought is that the dogs in the third generation have the greatest influence on the puppies.
Close breeding- closer than line breeding but not as close as in breeding
Out-crossing- introduces a totally different set of genes.Breeding of unrelated animals. 5 generation pedigree with no related animals. But maybe type to type can help your breeding program. Hybrid vigor.
The dominant male line is always on the top of the pedigree and the dominant female line is on the tail female side of the pedigree.
That’s it folks……………………….
Live for our dogs and Not off our dogs.
Form-Function verses Fad - Fashion
It is amazing how complete is the delusion that beauty is goodness.
Look for traits that render a dog unsuitable to do the job for which he was bred.
A longer dog can move better to conceal more faults.
Stages of Evolution:
1. stage 1- Breed evolves because of its usefulness to man.
2. stage 2 -Man selects breeding stock to best enhance usefulness.( this is the purest stage of development)
3. stage 3-Breed becomes a luxury item…………..pet or showdog
When stage three becomes an end in itself then a breed becomes one in trouble.
Functional type is working type.And this is not standing type. ( standing on a line to have it’s photo taken)
Straight Fronts—————-
Why are breeders and judges picking for this? Part of the problem is small rings and short diagonals. ( a more angled dog has a very short space in order to try to show[properly) . Ann-Marie’s comment…….Several years ago many dog shows used to open both rings so that the German Shepherd Dog had the room necessary to move out comfortably. Considering that in Europe the Shepherds are shown in football stadiums…you can undersatnd how a 40 foot ring is a real handicap.Straighter dogs can get into position faster and hold it easier and longer than those dogs with correct fronts.The CKC/AKC/CFC ring is no test for a dog…ie read German Shepherd. Form and function cannot be separated if you are a purist.Pretty is as pretty does. Exaggeration can become a threat to any selection process.
Correct Fronts- there is nothing more misunderstood, nothing easier to loose, nothing harder to reagain and nothing more important in the dog.( Ann-Marie again—-hind ends can be fixed in one breeding but if you loose your fronts then you are in big trouble.)
OK. That is it for today……………………………more tomorrow.
Hi Rally Enthusiasts - Here is confirmation of dates for a Rally Workshop / Seminar in the Spring.
The dates will be April 24 & 25, 2010 at the Lions Den in Amherst, Nova Scotia.
The Tantramar Club members plan a Fun Match on the Sunday, April 25 - giving you a wonderful opportunity to have practice sessions before the Show & Trial season gets going in earnest.
I’m going to spend some time preparing a ‘possible’ format that will be up-dated from the last work shop. We (Reta & Norma) plan to focus not only on course design & prep work, the Stewards in Rally, but also a description on the ‘how’ each station should be performed; a possible aid for Rally Instructors.
Some of you have asked ‘ how should ______ station be taught and/or judged?’ Hopefully, this workshop will answer your questions. Meanwhile, we’d like you to keep an ongoing record to present during the Q & A periods.
This workshop is open to all Obedience & Rally Judges, Rally only Judges, AND all Performance Exhibitors. Please feel free to forward this message to those who may not receive it.
The fee of $40.00 will include information packages, the Fun Match plus a lot of practice time. Registration form coming soon.
Our friends of the Tantramar Kennel Club will have their always fabulous canteen…..
Bring yourselves, bring your dogs for a fun filled week-end.
Further updates coming soon…. stay tuned.
Let’s Rally
Norma Hamilton
Subject: Competing German Shepherd Dog Organizations - Conflict of Interest
The Proposed Amendment Related to USA Membership and Membership in Competing German Shepherd Dog Organizations
Recently there has been a lot of discussion amongst our membership and on the chat lists regarding some of the proposed by-law changes. We have anxious members worried about the future of our organization and the German shepherd dog breed. The issue is complicated because it involves numerous factors related to the international scene that most are unaware of. Many who criticize this proposed amendment do so because they focus on the perception that an alternative path for monetary gain and glory would be closed to them. They harp on this, intent on raising opposition and discord, all the while abandoning their loyalty to the betterment of the German shepherd dog and the organization that has truly effected the breed’s betterment over the past thirty three years in the US and internationally. Moreover and unfortunately, many of our members are being misled and misguided by those that have a clear conflict of interest.
The United Schutzhund Clubs of America continues to be a full member of the WUSV. The AWDF also received a letter last year, from the FCI, granting continued participation as a guest in their FCI Working Championships. While we are not members of the FCI, neither is the AKC or any of its breed clubs. Our events continue to be internationally recognized. Just recently, the SV awarded eleven of our senior judges with SV foreign judge licenses. This is an epochal accomplishment and evinces the respect our organization has attained internationally. We also have four of our USA Judges that are FCI recognized. This is another strong indication of the international acceptance of the United Schutzhund Clubs of America.
History has shown that the GSDCA has, on more than one occasion, attempted to hinder with the United Schutzhund Clubs of America’s international recognition within the WUSV. Those attempts were unsuccessful. History also shows that without the United Schutzhund Clubs of America, the development of the German shepherd dog in the United States as a working dog with adherence to the FCI standard would be very minimal, if even existent.
On several occasions, I initiated discussions with the leadership of the WDA and the GSDCA in attempting to establish clear communication and cooperation amongst our organizations. I envisioned our organizations working together and sharing ideas for the betterment of the breed. This past May, the President of the WDA and I agreed to work on a plan for a merger of our organizations. It was agreed, that since the United Schutzhund Clubs of America held a seat as a full member of the WUSV and the WDA did not, that I would work on the development of proposed by-law changes to merge both organizations. I was excited about the future of the German shepherd dog in this country and was preparing the necessary by-law changes to make this happen at our General Board Meeting this November. Just a few weeks later, the WDA signed a contract with the GSDCA. Unbeknownst to me, the President of the WDA also purportedly had a meeting with the AKC to promote WDA self interests while I was working on the necessary changes to effect a merger between our organizations. This is not the first time in the history of our organizational relationship that we have been misguided by WDA leadership. Although I was cautioned by several members, I maintained a cautious optimism that the current group was different. Certainly it would have been in all of our best interests to work together as separate organizations aligning with a common goal: “To protect and preserve the working German shepherd dog represented by the FCI standard”. While the optimism I once maintained about this possibility has all but dissipated; I still hold to the hope that the GSDCA and WDA will work honestly with the United Schutzhund Clubs of America for the betterment of the German shepherd dog through adherence to the FCI standards for structure, health and temperament.
The United Schutzhund Clubs of America should not change our stance on this position because the GSDCA has now decided to suddenly develop a stronger relationship with the WDA. Those organizations are placing their hopes that such an alliance will lead them to host a successful 2013 WUSV Championship. However,there has been no abandonment of the GSDCA’s love affair with “their American Shepherd”. Obviously, just look at the picture on the front page of their website.
It is time that our membership faces the issue of the huge conflict of interest that exists from belonging to both organizations. Belonging to an organization(GSDCA-WDA), whose idea of the German shepherd dog is so totally out of line with the FCI standard, hinders our ability to protect the WORKING heritage and FCI standard of the German shepherd dog in the United States. Please go beyond the rhetoric and determine the true motivations of those that voice self-centered indignation of the proposed by-law amendment by saying, “Organizations be damned, I just want to show my dog!!!!” Please also read between the lines and question the accuracy and truthfulness of those who are trying to rally your support by saying “Don’t let them tell you what to do! Show them you will not be told what to do!” As was pointed out to me by one of our members, in order to represent the WDA as a member of the WUSV team, membership in the GSDCA is a requirement. I ask you who is telling whom what to do? All we are doing is asking you to make a choice, the right choice.
Thank you very much for your attention to this letter. I hope it provides further information to justify the amendment and to rally your support in favor of it.
Yours in the sport and for the betterment of the breed,
Lyle Roetemeyer
|
||||||||
|
|
|
.
|
Grunfeld now has a Facebook page. Enter Grunfeld German shepherds and follow the pictures etc from clients and friends.
|
And now for the show itself. If you have read my predictions on the `net, you will be aware that I was “darn close in my educated guesses” in spite of many absentees due to sale overseas (mostly China) or retirement. My prognostications are based both on my personal observation of gait & anatomy, and on how the dogs have performed in the past. For those who are breeders or prospective puppy buyers, I am listing the current hip rating (Zuchtwert) in parentheses behind dogs’ names. The lower, the better or safer. In the 70s is preferred, but close to 90 or above represents increased risk of dysplasia. Entries and attendance were still down from many previous years because of the world economy, but Europe is better off than America in this regard, and is bouncing back earlier. The show was noticeably better than last year, and in a much better stadium.
But even in spite of this supposed safeguard for the integrity of the breed, many unworthy dogs sneak past this intended barrier, because the performance judges will frequently “pass” with a “Pronounced” rating some dogs that should fail or get a “Vorhanden” (passing but not very good). And the judges who are doing the individual conformation judging in a location far from the bitework (they are the ones that will rank the adults then and in the next two days) are not able to see the actual work. Therefore, they cannot consider a poor performance when they grade the dogs by beauty. Last year, with only 155 adult males, there were 21 “working” (open, adult, titled) males who were either T2 “Vorhanden” (barely sufficient, but to place at the end of all the others if they stayed for that part of the show) or T3 “Nicht Genügend” (insufficient courage and not eligible to return for the beauty-&-gaiting competition). This year, there were 55 in those two categories combined, out of 237 presented. These figures have more meaning when you realize that in 2008, 14% of these males were T3 or T2, but in 2009, a whopping 23% “failed” (with both of these categories being failure in my demanding opinion). It was with a sickening feeling that most of the crowd watched and waited for decent performances. These statistics were somewhat offset by the larger numbers of working-line dogs entered, well-received by the crowd, and doing fairly well this year. Another disappointment that I have voiced before, is the excusal from further competition, of dogs whose owners decide that their chances of making a big splash with a super placing have been diminished. This belief could be based on how the judge has placed the dog before, or comments made on this day, or other reason. The owner might feel it is better for stud-service reasons to pull the dog than to receive a placing further back than he believes the dog deserves. It used to be the rule that such a withdrawal from continued competition on the weekend required a veterinarian’s statement that the dog was sick or lame, but that route was so corrupted that it was misused or practically abandoned. On the other hand, there are many “working-lines” dogs whose owners just wanted their bitework to be seen by thousands of people, and who didn’t want to waste the time trying to get a show placing behind 150 other dogs.
Some dogs were not listed in the official tabulation as having been excused from competition. The slap-on-the-wrist “punishment” of not being allowed to compete for a few months is meaningless, because there are almost no shows in winter anyway. There are several reasons for their absence, not many being easy to discover. For example, the very nice-looking and good-working Tyson Köttersbusch only did the bitework and showed in his progeny group but, reportedly because of his size(?), the owner didn’t show him. In females, I listed Alisha Eichenplatz (85), Viva Hopfenhalle (69!), Chayenne Karthäuser Löwentor (81), and Lea d’Ulmental (89) in that order, which was also close, as they finished VA2, VA9, V4, and VA7, respectively. You may remember that last year my group visited Chayenne at home after the show. Siegerin this year is the Vegas daughter Bella Kuckucksland (89). A couple of other bitches that caught my eye in the protection and gaiting were the Sirio daughter VA-10 Mega Holtkämper See (81), and the beautiful V6 Romina Piste Trophe (95). Other than the dogs that completely lacked courage or those that failed to get a “pronounced” (ausgeprägt) and “lets out” (lässt ab — stops fighting on command or when struggle stops), there are other results with these codes: T1 = lässt nicht ab, ohne Bewertung TSB (doesn’t out in time, but no problem with the fighting drives); and T4 = abgebrochen wegen mangelnder Führigkeit, which means the dog failed to heel all the way to the point where the “bad guy” with the sleeve runs out from the blind to attack them. Many over-eager and less-trained dogs jump the gun, and they only have 3 tries to do it right. Unfortunately there were a few males who weren’t so controlled in that approach to the first blind, one of which was the strong-character dog we visited a few days later, Yvo Wildsteiger Land. This beautiful, well-constructed Odin son is pictured in the photo appendix to this article. And he has a Zuchtwert of 78, which is quite good. His problem this year was that he was too playful instead of serious about the bitework. I already mentioned some of the top winners, and you can go to the SV websites for the official listing of all dogs shown, or any of the private sites that carry the whole results. However, in this report, I’d like to mention that I may have missed a few (one must visit the toilet once in a while!) and I wish to comment in detail on some others that may not have done as well as the top-placing dogs. So you will find here something more than just a catalog of winners. After each Sieger Show, I discuss with my group these additional observations. Remo Fichtenschlag (71), owned by Josephine Kao of Taiwan, got VA 7. Two places behind him was Paul Bierstadter Hof (77), a handsome Odin son with very good upper arm and chest development. V3 Paer Hasenborn (75) was not very convincing in the bites. V4 Clinten Holtkämper See (75) did not do good bitework, but got “ausgepragt” (pronounced) anyway. Peik Holtkämper Hof (75) was V11 this year, but watch for this great Ilbo/Roma son to make great strides in 2010, and I’d wager that he’ll have a great progeny class in 2011 if the Chinese don’t buy him too quickly. The Odin son V23 Ballack zu Worringer Rheinaue looked great and did very good protection routines. Yoe Haus Salihin (75) has a substantially lower ZW than his VA2 litter brother, did equally impressive protection work, and placed V27 in the beauty pageant. Also with a ZW of 75, the Esko Dänischen Hof son V34 Hero Annacarton (owned by Irishman Patrick Thomas) lived up to his name. Mr. T. also owns the great Ilbo Holtkämper See. V29 Chivas Bad-Boll (Odin son with a great ZW of 76) is promising in both the courage and beauty departments.
Bazi Urbecke offspring (the adults) did very well in bitework and all looked very uniform in the progeny group. Outstanding among them were V98 Aslan Belle Amber (80), who showed excellent training, did not take re-bites or nibbles/chomping, and never turned to look over his shoulder; and V25 Frodo Langenbungert (89). One Bazi son, V67 Vigu (89) did not deserve the “ausgeprägt” he was given. Incidentally, his brother Valof just won V2 in Argentina’s Mar del Plata (Landesgruppen) show and “best attack” trophy. As expected, Hill Farbenspiel offspring did admirable work, such as Hillson (92), V89 Falco Bonne Patte (95), VA 3 Yukon, and V65 Urbano Urbecke (88). Other miscellaneous comments on performance: The work by Panjo was good; that of Vegas son Cronos d’Ulmental (91) excellent (but he was then pulled); VA4 Kwantum (90) was a happy worker with great anatomy and reddish pigment. V1 Ustinov Römerland (82) did good work for a Quantum Arminius son (and half-brother to Sgr. Zamp). The Vegas son Arex Wilhelmswarte (84), bred by a SchH-trial judge and owned by a wealthy fancier, did poorly in the courage test yet got both “ausgeprägt” and V2; hopefully his performance will improve next year. The well-trained V49 Danish dog Karat’s Fedor (88) had wonderful attitude on the field and at ringside — his great parents are Aiko Goldenen Zweig and Karat’s Olly. Aiko also was sire of the good-working V69 Indro. V75 Xambo Roten Feld (72) was impressive in the work, as was Rüdiger Mai’s Dux Cuatro Flores son V43 Atlas Bierstadter Hof (96, unfortunately). We missed Godalis Tino this year because he tore a ligament in a rear leg. As usual, the better performances were mostly done by the working-lines dogs, but they were also better represented in the progeny groups, kennel groups, and the show competition than previously. The ones that impressed me the most were V54 Javir v. Talka Marda (with a fabulous 70 ZW!) and his sons, V122 Zidane v. Kammberg (71), V124 Yack v. Kammberg (70), the dark sable and super worker V125 J.J. v. Trauntor (76), and daughter V118 Chini v. Ecke (70). There were many other, younger dogs in his progeny group, and all with happy, energetic temperaments. I suspect they will also prove to have admirable Zuchtwert numbers, too. Javir could be considered the star of Friday’s show. His intense and enthusiastic jumping straight up during the bark-and-hold, while barking in the face of the helper/attacker, excited the crowd. Good topline, though he could have taken some fewer steps in the gaiting. Zidane actually tore the sleeve off the attacker on the “long bite” (running attack down the field). Yack thrilled spectators with his incredibly long (and accurate) Malinois-like flying leap to hit the attacker on the long bite.
The judges recognized 20 males as having outstanding working drives, including Sieger Vegas, Aik Z, Untox Freiheit Westerholt, Yack and Zidane with their sire Javir, Ober, Ballack, Hutch, Nexx, Filou, and Hillson. Eight females were so honored, and included Chini and Lea whom I have mentioned. As mentioned earlier, I concentrated my viewing on the adult males, but also saw some excellent younger dogs. One was the Irok son / Fritz Farbenspiel grandson from Pisa Italy, Taris dei Profeti. Owned by Giuliano Profeti, one of Italy’s premier breeders, Taris did not initially place high enough (in the “first group” in his very large class), so he was pulled before the final ranking. Maybe next year’s judge will like him better, Giuliano hopes. He has great strength in body and head, dark eyes and mask, and very good reach (a bit better than his action in the rear). Winner of that 12-18 month male class was Sultan Jahnhohe (77), who stood out yards ahead of his nearest competition. This animated Vegas son has an excellent front assembly, good proportions though a bit stretched and long in second thigh, high withers, and a handsome head like his sire’s. Watch for this outstanding dog with VA potential next year, if the Chinese don’t get him first. In third place was another Vegas son, Marcus Ossmann’s Wegas Fichtenschlag (86) with excellence overall, but not a threat to the class leader this day. Also in that class was the very promising Bazi son, SG16 Yello Arminius (71), who could do with just a little more front angulation, but has everything else going for him. I like him very much. SG 2 was Nino v Tronje (97), another Irok son of high anatomical quality but a little lacking in desire by the time I spotted him. SG 22 Lux Valentinientis, a Nick Moorbeck son owned by Ernst Ruckert but not yet listed in the ZW statistics, has very good reach and drive, and good eye and mask pigment. SG4 was Sammo di Casa Beggiato (82), an Ober Bad-Boll son that Hans-Peter Rieker probably has great plans for. By the way, the ZW numbers of young dogs is more a calculation of their parents’ records than their own production because of their age (too young to produce X-rayed offspring themselves). In Jugendklasse Rüden (12-18 months old males), I got to see a few very promising future stars. Uday Jani’s Godalis Tino son, Iceman Amur (78) was SG 5, and had very nice anatomy overall. Behind him in 6th position was another well-structured dog, the Zamp son Kratmosen’s Baroni. The Odin son, SG11 Ritzy Wustenberger-Land, owned by American Jeannette Kempkes, presented an outstanding outline and gait. Second, third, and fourth in that class were wonderful young dogs whose owners are from Italy, France, and Peru. Whether your main interest is the enthralling beauty show, the sometimes-exciting courage tests at the show, shopping for a younger dog or a breeder, or to see an interesting part of Europe with an experienced judge-guide and friendly companions, you might wish to join my tour. Now, here’s the “commercial”: to prepare fully, I recommend that you get my book on The Total GSD (from me or from the publisher, Hoflin), and if you are breeding or curious, think about ordering my big HD & orthopedics book (direct from me). Pictures for this report are in a separate appendix, and both should be available on selected websites. If you did not find the photos, e-mail me for a URL where you can get them. note: Author and worldwide consultant Fred Lanting <mr.gsd@]netscape.com> is an internationally respected GSD specialty and all-breed judge for many registries, has judged numerous countries’ Sieger Shows and Landesgruppen events, and presents seminars on such topics as Structure, Orthopedic Disorders, Training Techniques, and the GSD. Fred invites all to join his annual non-profit Sieger Show and sightseeing tour. Articles can be found on http://siriusdog.com/sphider/search.php?query=lanting&search=1 , or by a Google search for his name. Request permission to reprint these copyright pieces and add this or a similar notice at the end. |